Abstract
The detrimental effect of speaker variability on word recognition has been reported using a wide variety of tasks and stimuli. In this study, the use of dysarthric speech alongside unimpaired speech allowed us to examine the effect of indexical variability from a new perspective. We compared voice-specificity effects in words produced by healthy speakers and the same words produced by dysarthric patients suffering from Huntington’s disease (HD). The speech of persons with HD is particularly suited to this issue because of its idiosyncratic and variable manifestation. Reaction time and accuracy results provided confirmatory evidence for Luce et al.’s (2003) time-course hypothesis: The slower responses occasioned by processing dysarthric stimuli were accompanied with greater reliance on surface details of the stimuli. Thus, specificity effects can be seen as resulting from a coping strategy called upon when the system is presented with an input that is highly dissimilar from canonical lexical representations. In addition, we found some evidence that the time-course hypothesis holds even when intelligibility is controlled. This finding confirms that time, rather than processing effort, is the cause of specificity effects, with activation confined to abstract representations in an early stage and spreading to episodic traces later on.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
