Abstract

The ideal free distribution assumes that animals select habitats that are beneficial to their fitness. When the needs of dependent offspring differ from those of the parent, ideal habitat selection patterns could vary with the presence or absence of offspring. We test whether habitat selection depends on reproductive state due to top‐down or bottom‐up influences on the fitness of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), a threatened, wide‐ranging herbivore. We combined established methods of fitting resource and step selection functions derived from locations of collared animals in Ontario with newer techniques, including identifying calf status from video collar footage and seasonal habitat selection analysis through latent selection difference functions. We found that females with calves avoided predation risk and proximity to roads more strongly than females without calves within their seasonal ranges. At the local scale, females with calves avoided predation more strongly than females without calves. Females with calves increased predation avoidance but not selection for food availability upon calving, whereas females without calves increased selection for food availability across the same season. These behavioral responses suggest that habitat selection by woodland caribou is influenced by reproductive state, such that females with calves at heel use habitat selection to offset the increased vulnerability of their offspring to predation risk.

Highlights

  • Animals need to acquire energy to survive, grow, and reproduce

  • We found that avoidance of predation risk and proximity to roads depended on whether a calf was at heel, but that selection for food availability was not influenced by the presence of young calves

  • We aimed to determine whether the presence of young calves affects the distribution of woodland caribou, identify which top-­ down and bottom-­up influences on fitness might drive differences in habitat selection, and provide an example of the utility of video collars in wildlife ecology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals need to acquire energy to survive, grow, and reproduce. Mobile animals can increase their energetic intake by selecting habitats where more energy is available. The ideal free distribution predicts that all else being equal, animals in a landscape with heterogeneous resource availability should distribute themselves in proportion to the amount of resources available (Fretwell & Lucas, 1969). Animals are not expected to use habitat selection to maximize energetic intake in the presence of an immediate threat to survival. Some prey species will select habitats with lower predation risk even if this constrains their access to energy (Hernández & Laundré, 2005). Prey species exposed to both top-­ down and bottom-­up constraints on fitness need to balance the

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call