Abstract

Pallets are the tiny cogs in the machine that drive transportation in the global economy. The profusion of pallets in today’s supply chain warrants the investigation and discussion of their respective environmental impacts. This paper reviews the life cycle assessment studies analyzing the environmental impacts of pallets with the intent of providing insights into the methodological choices made, as well as compiling the inventory data from the studies reviewed. The study is a meta-analysis of eleven scientific articles, two conference articles, two peer-reviewed reports, and one thesis. The review was implemented to identify the key methodological choices made in those studies, such as their goals, functional units, system boundaries, inventory data, life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) procedures, and results. The 16 studies reviewed cumulatively analyzed 43 pallets. Mostly pooled (n = 22/43), block-type (n = 13/43), and wooden (n = 32/43) pallets with dimensions of 1219 mm × 1016 mm or 48 in. × 40 in. (n = 15/43) were studied. Most of the studies represented pallet markets in the United States (n = 9/16). Load-based (e.g., 1000 kg of products delivered), trip-based (e.g., 1000 trips), and pallet-based (e.g., one pallet) functional units were declared. A trip-based functional unit seems the most appropriate for accounting of the function of the pallets, as its purpose is to carry goods and facilitate the transportation of cargo. A significant amount of primary inventory data on the production and repair of wooden and plastic pallets are available, yet there are significant variations in the data. Data on pallets made of wood–polymer composites was largely missing.

Highlights

  • In the existing world of increasing mobility and growing trade, material and commodities need to be transported safely across various actors of the economy: from suppliers to manufacturers, from manufacturers to warehouses, from warehouses to retailers, and to consumers

  • The results show a large variation in the climate change impacts of wooden pallets

  • The results indicated that the waste plastic pallets were 3–801 times better than the conventional plastic pallet depending on the impact category analyzing the results per trip

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the existing world of increasing mobility and growing trade, material and commodities need to be transported safely across various actors of the economy: from suppliers to manufacturers, from manufacturers to warehouses, from warehouses to retailers, and to consumers. Despite being simple in design, often undergo vastly different lifecycles depending on management strategy [3,4]. There are three pallet management strategies that dominate the industry: single-use, buy/sell, and pooled. Single-use is the simplest strategy wherein pallets are discarded after one trip. Standardized pallets are usually designed to last for several trips. In the buy/sell strategy, pallets are freely exchanged on the market making it impossible to precisely estimate their use intensity. The increasing demand on pallets, the growing competition on the market, as well as the introduction of novel materials, such as composites, have mutually driven the need to assess their environmental impacts. No comprehensive review of the literature available has been published until now

Review Process
Studies Reviewed
Functional Unit
System Boundary
Life Cycle Inventory
Life Cycle Impact Assessment
Pallets Studied
Wooden Pallets
Plastic Pallets
Carbon Footprint
The life cycle stages were abbreviated as follows
Other Impact Categories by Studies
Reuse Intensity
GMA-Sized Wooden and Plastic Pallets
Pallets in Australia and China
Pallets Made of Waste Plastic or Tropical Wood
Conclusions
34. Modern Materials Handling the Pallet Report
Findings
36. European Pallet Association EPAL
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call