Abstract
This comment examines proposals set out in this journal (Cuvillier, 1993) for taxing the imputed incomes of housewives in order to remove favourable treatment by the tax and benefit system which is an incentive to their remaining in the home. It briefly outlines Cuvillier's thesis and proposals and offers a critical assessment of the reforms she recommends. It finds that though the analysis of the problem is lucid and persuasive, the proposals are impracticable, unfair and largely irrelevant. It concludes that the distortions which affect women's choices about working outside the home are not implicit tax and benefit subsidies but obstacles: lack of affordable childcare and poverty traps in the tax and benefits systems.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
