Abstract

BackgroundWorldwide maternal perception of fetal movements has been used for many years to evaluate fetal wellbeing. It is intuitively regarded as an expression of fetal well-being as pregnancies in which women consistently report regular fetal movements have very low morbidity and mortality. Conversely, maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We sought to gain insight into pregnant women’s and clinicians views and experiences of reduced movements.MethodWe performed qualitative semi-structured interviews with pregnant women who experienced reduced fetal movements in their current pregnancy and health professionals who provide maternity care. Our aim was to develop a better understanding of events, facilitators and barriers to presentation with reduced fetal movements. Data analysis was conducted using framework analysis principles.ResultsTwenty-one women and 10 clinicians were interviewed. The themes that emerged following the final coding were influences of social network, facilitators and barriers to presentation and the desire for normality.ConclusionsThis study aids understanding about why women present with reduced movements and how they reach the decision to attend hospital. This should inform professionals’ views and practice, such that appreciating and addressing women’s concerns may reduce anxiety and make presentation with further reduced movements more likely, which is desirable as this group is at increased risk of adverse outcome. To address problems with information about normal and abnormal fetal movements, high-quality information is needed that is accessible to women and their families.

Highlights

  • Worldwide maternal perception of fetal movements has been used for many years to evaluate fetal wellbeing

  • We interviewed clinicians to identify the practical challenges relating to the identification and management of women with reduced fetal movements (RFM)

  • For the women interviewed here, their decision to present with RFM was influenced by their social network, by information about RFM obtained from various sources including the internet and maternity care providers, by concerns for their child’s wellbeing and a desire for a problem free pregnancy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Worldwide maternal perception of fetal movements has been used for many years to evaluate fetal wellbeing It is intuitively regarded as an expression of fetal well-being as pregnancies in which women consistently report regular fetal movements have very low morbidity and mortality. Worldwide maternal perception of fetal movements (FMs) has been used for many years to evaluate fetal wellbeing It is intuitively regarded as an expression of fetal well-being [1] as pregnancies in which women consistently report regular FMs have very low morbidity and mortality [2, 3]. Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including: stillbirth [3, 4], fetal growth restriction (FGR) [3], preterm birth [5], oligohydramnios [6] and fetal abnormality [7]. We undertook a qualitative study of women and health professionals to further

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call