Abstract

For those of us who were children during or after the 1950s it is difficult to appreciate the radical changes wrought by post-war welfare provision. That the welfare state provisions were based on assumptions of what are often referred to as ‘traditional’ gender roles was by no means uncontested and if William Beveridge had not been such an assertive chairman of the Interdepartmental Committee on Social Insurance and the Allied Services, the 1950s story might have been very different. It has now become a truism to highlight the changes that the Home Front caused in women’s lives in all social classes, but it does seem to have been acknowledged at the time that this was likely to be a long term change, not a temporary flight from domesticity: In this war we have millions of women going into industry, hundreds and thousands of them for the first time, single women and married women. They have enjoyed an income of their own, they have begun to enjoy economic independence. At the end of the war a large number of them will want both their careers and marriage and motherhood, and we have to base our plans for reconstruction on that.1 The introduction of a welfare state was central to plans for post-war reconstruction which were initiated in the early 1940s.2

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.