Abstract
ABSTRACTThis paper scrutinizes determinants of regional‐level institutions regulating the provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Two cases of maintaining ecosystem services, provided by quite different resource systems, are compared: the protection of wolves and the management of a high nature value agroforestry system, scattered fruit tree meadows. Taking an abductive approach, we suggest that the distinct characteristics of resources – in particular the mobility of resource units – and differences in the overarching European regulatory framework – the obligation to protect wolves versus voluntary compensation payments to maintain scattered fruit tree meadows – largely explain the existing institutional structures at regional level. Cost‐effectiveness considerations concerning the transaction costs of governance seem to act as determinants for the design and implementation of regional institutions. Livestock depredated by wolves is protected by a liability rule and hierarchical governance structures. In turn, maintenance of scattered fruit trees is subject to a property rule and voluntary long‐term agreements. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
