Abstract

AbstractOutdoor recreation is increasingly recognized to impact nature and wildlife, yet few studies have examined recreation within large natural landscapes that are critical habitat to some of our most rare and potentially disturbance‐sensitive species. Over six winters (2010–2015) and four study areas (>1.1 million ha) in Idaho, Wyoming, and Montana, we studied the responses of wolverines (Gulo gulo) to backcountry winter recreation. We fit Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to 24 individual wolverines and acquired >54,000 GPS locations over 39 animal‐years during winter (January–April). Simultaneously, we monitored winter recreation, collecting ~6000 GPS tracks (~200,000 km) from backcountry recreationists. We combined the GPS tracks with trail use counts and aerial recreation surveys to map the extent and relative intensity of motorized and non‐motorized recreation. We integrated our wolverine and backcountry recreation data to (1) assess patterns of wolverine habitat selection and (2) evaluate the effect of backcountry recreation on wolverine habitat relationships. We used resource selection functions to model habitat selection of male and female wolverines within their home ranges. We first modeled habitat selection for environmental covariates to understand male and female habitat use then incorporated winter recreation covariates. We assessed the potential for indirect habitat loss from winter recreation and tested for functional responses of wolverines to differing levels and types of recreation. Motorized recreation occurred at higher intensity across a larger footprint than non‐motorized recreation in most wolverine home ranges. Wolverines avoided areas of both motorized and non‐motorized winter recreation with off‐road recreation eliciting a stronger response than road‐based recreation. Female wolverines exhibited stronger avoidance of off‐road motorized recreation and experienced higher indirect habitat loss than male wolverines. Wolverines showed negative functional responses to the level of recreation exposure within the home range, with female wolverines showing the strongest functional response to motorized winter recreation. We suggest indirect habitat loss, particularly to females, could be of concern in areas with higher recreation levels. We speculate that the potential for backcountry winter recreation to affect wolverines may increase under climate change if reduced snow pack concentrates winter recreationists and wolverines in the remaining areas of persistent snow cover.

Highlights

  • Fostering societal appreciation for the conservation of nature partly relies upon individuals connecting to nature during leisure activities, which includes participating in outdoor recreation activities (Teisl and O’Brien 2003, Gifford and Nilsson 2014)

  • We developed wolverine resource selection functions (RSF) with a use: availability design to estimate the relative probability of selection (Manly et al 2002, Johnson et al 2006, McDonald 2013) including models with and without winter recreation covariates

  • We did not capture any female wolverines in the Tetons study area

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fostering societal appreciation for the conservation of nature partly relies upon individuals connecting to nature during leisure activities, which includes participating in outdoor recreation activities (Teisl and O’Brien 2003, Gifford and Nilsson 2014). In Europe, for example, high elevation forest grouse (Tetrao sp.) are negatively impacted by backcountry winter recreation including habitat displacement as well as energetic and physiological effects (Patthey et al 2008, Braunisch et al 2011, Arlettaz et al 2015, Coppes et al 2017b). Many species of large herbivore (e.g., red deer, Cervus elaphus; mountain caribou, Rangifer tarandus caribou; bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis; mountain goat, Oreamnos americanus; moose, Alces alces) have exhibited negative physiological or behavioral responses including indirect habitat loss through avoidance of motorized and non-motorized winter recreation (Seip et al 2007, Neumann et al 2009, Courtemanch 2014, Richard and Cote 2016, Coppes et al 2017a, Lesmerises et al 2018). As backcountry winter recreation grows in intensity and spatial extent, coupled with the potential concentration of activities due to climate change-driven reductions in snow area and season (Dawson et al 2013, Rutty et al 2015), there is a growing need to understand the impacts of recreation on wildlife species, and on those that are sensitive, snowassociated, and occupy alpine habitats

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call