Abstract

Human-directed gazing, a keystone in dog–human communication, has been suggested to derive from both domestication and breed selection. The influence of genetic similarity to wolves and selective pressures on human-directed gazing is still under debate. Here, we used the ‘unsolvable task’ to compare Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs (CWDs, a close-to-wolf breed), German Shepherd Dogs (GSDs) and Labrador Retrievers (LRs). In the ‘solvable task’, all dogs learned to obtain the reward; however, differently from GSDs and LRs, CWDs rarely gazed at humans. In the ‘unsolvable task’, CWDs gazed significantly less towards humans compared to LRs but not to GSDs. Although all dogs were similarly motivated to explore the apparatus, CWDs and GSDs spent a larger amount of time in manipulating it compared to LRs. A clear difference emerged in gazing at the experimenter versus owner. CWDs gazed preferentially towards the experimenter (the unfamiliar subject manipulating the food), GSDs towards their owners and LRs gazed at humans independently from their level of familiarity. In conclusion, it emerges that the artificial selection operated on CWDs produced a breed more similar to ancient breeds (more wolf-like due to a less-intense artificial selection) and not very human-oriented. The next step is to clarify GSDs' behaviour and better understand the genetic role of this breed in shaping CWDs’ heterospecific behaviour.

Highlights

  • Human-directed gazing, a keystone in dog–human communication, has been suggested to derive from both domestication and breed selection

  • All dogs were motivated to explore the apparatus, Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs (CWDs) and German Shepherd Dogs (GSDs) spent a larger amount of time in manipulating it compared to Labrador Retrievers (LRs)

  • No significant age differences emerged across the three groups (Kruskal–Wallis test: χ2 = 1.76; NCWD = 17; NLR = 14; NGS = 12; d.f. = 2; p = 0.415)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human-directed gazing, a keystone in dog–human communication, has been suggested to derive from both domestication and breed selection. CWDs gazed preferentially towards the experimenter (the unfamiliar subject manipulating the food), GSDs towards their owners and LRs gazed at humans independently from their level of familiarity It emerges that the artificial selection operated on CWDs produced a breed more similar to ancient breeds (more wolf-like due to a less-intense artificial selection) and not very human-oriented. Studies investigating the role of genetic and developmental factors on dogs’ capacity to respond to human communicative cues (e.g. different types of pointing, head turning, gazing) are rather numerous [3,10,24,25,26,27]; on the other hand, those considering how these aspects may have influenced dogs’ ability to produce communicative signals towards humans are still more limited [5,6,18,20,28]. A deeper understanding of how artificial selection, developmental factors and social environment contributed to modern dog’s gazing behaviour is relevant both at theoretical and practical levels

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call