Abstract
In this article the following thesis is defended: Wittgenstein “exorcises” skeptical arguments by showing a conception of language and knowledge which has come to be characterized as naturalism and quietism. And this article distinguishes between Wittgensteinian quietist and naturalistic approaches, on the one hand, and McDowell’s own naturalism, the minimal empiricism, on the other. Unlike the latter, the Wittgensteinian proposal offers us the possibility of rejecting the skeptical challenge.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.