Abstract
This essay seeks to identify the differences between theology without walls and comparative religion, comparative theology, and interreligious dialogue. All of these undertakings call for interreligious engagements, but because theology without walls aims not just at what is similar but also at what is true and life-giving, it differs clearly from comparative religion but resembles comparative theology and interreligious dialogue. But, because theology without walls does not have a “home base” in one religious tradition, it differs from both comparative theology and interreligious dialogue. Finally, because the theologian without borders must have multiple home bases, theology without walls bears the greatest resemblance to what is today called Double Belonging.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
