Abstract

Foraging theory predicts that individuals should choose a prey that maximizes energy rewards relative to the energy expended to access, capture, and consume the prey. However, the relative roles of differences in the nutritive value of foods and costs associated with differences in prey accessibility are not always clear. Coral-feeding fishes are known to be highly selective feeders on particular coral genera or species and even different parts of individual coral colonies. The absence of strong correlations between the nutritional value of corals and prey preferences suggests other factors such as polyp accessibility may be important. Here, we investigated within-colony feeding selectivity by the corallivorous filefish, Oxymonacanthus longirostris, and if prey accessibility determines foraging patterns. After confirming that this fish primarily feeds on coral polyps, we examined whether fish show a preference for different parts of a common branching coral, Acropora nobilis, both in the field and in the laboratory experiments with simulated corals. We then experimentally tested whether nonuniform patterns of feeding on preferred coral species reflect structural differences between polyps. We found that O. longirostris exhibits nonuniform patterns of foraging in the field, selectively feeding midway along branches. On simulated corals, fish replicated this pattern when food accessibility was equal along the branch. However, when food access varied, fish consistently modified their foraging behavior, preferring to feed where food was most accessible. When foraging patterns were compared with coral morphology, fish preferred larger polyps and less skeletal protection. Our results highlight that patterns of interspecific and intraspecific selectivity can reflect coral morphology, with fish preferring corals or parts of coral colonies with structural characteristics that increase prey accessibility.

Highlights

  • Animals seldom exist within a nutritionally homogeneous environment, and as a result of variable nutritional composition and prey accessibility, they can experience a range of dietary options (Rapport 1980)

  • Fishes did not forage on A. nobilis uniformly (ANOVA, F2,57 = 164.2, P < 0.001)

  • Our field studies and laboratory experiments demonstrate that O. longirostris does not feed uniformly from coral colonies, but is selecting feeding positions with greater polyp accessibility, rather than those that are more nutritious

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals seldom exist within a nutritionally homogeneous environment, and as a result of variable nutritional composition and prey accessibility, they can experience a range of dietary options (Rapport 1980). Optimal foraging theory predicts that an individual should prefer prey species of high nutritional value relative to the energy spent to locate, capture, and consume the prey (Charnov 1976; Pyke et al 1977). The nutritional value of a given prey species may vary in response to differences in the condition or reproductive status of individuals, making optimum prey choice difficult (Fitzgibbon 1990; Gende et al 2001; Lane et al 2011). Relative nutritional value may vary within an individual, with consumers selectively targeting specific parts that provide the greatest nutritional benefit (Andrew and Jones 1990; Gende et al 2001; Pekar et al 2010; Pitman and Durban 2012) or the least protected parts of a prey organism

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call