Abstract

To compare two consecutive swallowing attempts to study if there is a difference in Rosenbek’s penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) scores between the first and second swallowing attempt of the same bolus type in videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VFS). Additional aims include reflecting on which bolus sizes and consistencies are the most relevant to include in further studies for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. The VFS for 38 patients curatively treated for HNC was studied. All included patients showed swallowing difficulties (PAS ≥ 2). The examination protocol included two swallows each of six different boluses: 3, 5, 10, 20 ml thin, 5 ml mildly thick, and 3 ml of extremely thick liquid. All boluses were compared between the first and second swallowing attempt with regard to PAS scores. No statistically significant differences in PAS were found between the first and second swallow for any of the boluses in this study on group level. For 20 ml thin and 3 ml extremely thick liquid, there were low Intra-Class Correlations, indicating a low within-bolus agreement. The greatest within-bolus differences were found for 20 ml thin, 5 ml mildly thick and 3 ml extremely thick liquid, which demonstrated high intra-individual coefficient of variation (0.458–0.759). The data of this study show a high within-bolus variability of the PAS score between two subsequent swallows for all different consistencies. In order to assess swallowing safety, the highest PAS score for each bolus type is suggested for use in studies of HNC patients.

Highlights

  • Videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VFS) is a common method for assessment of swallowing function

  • Additional aims include reflecting on which bolus sizes and consistencies are the most relevant to include in further studies for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients

  • The VFS for 38 patients curatively treated for HNC was studied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VFS) is a common method for assessment of swallowing function. There are different ways of interpreting the examinations, where rating scales are one option to describe the degree of dysfunction [1,2,3]. The interpretations always include some measure of penetration or aspiration [4,5,6,7,8,9], such as Rosenbek’s penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) [3]. Pneumonia occurs in up to one in four head and neck cancer (HNC) patients following concurrent chemoradiotherapy [11, 12]. The incidence of pneumonia is about ten percent in a non-cancer population [12]. Accurate estimation of penetration or aspiration in HNC patients is an important objective of VFS

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call