Within- and between-talker variability in voice quality in normal speaking situations

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that voices are best thought of as complex auditory patterns, and that listeners perceive and remember voices with reference to a “prototype” or “average” for that talker. Little is known about how, and how much, individual talkers vary their voice quality across situations that arise in every-day speaking, so the nature and extent of variability underlying these abstract averages, and thus the nature of the averages themselves, is unclear. The theoretical relationship between acoustic similarity and confusability in the context of a prototype model also remains unclear. In this preliminary study, 9 tokens of the vowel /a/ were recorded from 5 females on three dates. Measures of F0, spectral slope, HNR, and formant frequencies and their variability were gathered for all voice samples and acoustic distances between talkers were calculated under the assumption that all acoustic variables were equally important perceptually. Perceptual confusability was assessed in a same/different task, and predictions under the equal perceptual weight assumption were tested. Discussion will focus on how much variability is required before a voice sample no longer sounds like the originating talker, and on how the perceptual importance of each acoustical variable varies across talkers and acoustic contexts. [Work supported by NSF and NIH.]