Abstract

Since of the 1940s, there has been wide controversy about the most effective surgical treatment for the primary benign parotid tumor. This review investigates the effectiveness and associated complications of superficial parotidectomy versus total conservative parotidectomy in the management of primary benign parotid tumors. An electronic search with restricted dates (1920-2014) and restricted language was performed in August 2014. Thirteen studies were included. In total, 2477 patients were enrolled in the 13 studies, with 1317 patients undergoing superficial parotidectomy and 391 patients undergoing total conservative parotidectomy; 769 patients treated with other surgical techniques were excluded. The maximum follow-up period varied between 2 and 24 years (mean 2.8 years). The incidence of recurrence in the superficial parotidectomy patients ranged from 0% to 15% (mean 5.7%), whereas, in the total conservative parotidectomy patients it ranged from 0% to 16% (mean 3.03%). The incidence of the facial nerve paresis according to collected data in the superficial parotidectomy group ranged from 0% to 23% (mean 6.75%), whereas in the total conservative parotidectomy group it was 0%-45% (mean 15%). The incidence of facial nerve paralysis in the superficial parotidectomy group ranged from 0% to 3% (mean 0.8%), whereas in the total conservative parotidectomy group it was 0%-17 % (mean 4.4%). The results of this review suggest that superficial parotidectomy is superior to total conservative parotidectomy in the management of primary benign tumor in superficial lobes. In addition, superficial parotidectomy showed a minimal recurrence rate for benign tumor in superficial lobes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.