Abstract
IntroductionThe use of minimally invasive cerclages at the tibia is not very common. First clinical results of a new operative technique published recently showed no increased complication rate. The aim of this anatomical study was to determine, if it is possible to introduce a minimally invasive cerclage at different levels of the tibia without encasing relevant nerves, vessels or tendons into the cerclage using this technique. HypothesisThe minimally invasive introduction of a cerclage at the tibia is possible without encasing relevant anatomical structures. Material and methodsUsing the minimally invasive operative technique in 10 human cadaveric lower legs, cerclages were inserted at 4 different levels of each tibia. They were defined from proximal to distal as levels 1–4. The legs were severed at the levels of the cerclages and examined for any relevant encased anatomical structures. Afterwards, the shortest distance between each relevant anatomical structure and the cerclage was measured. ResultsThere was no encasing of any relevant anatomical structures in any specimen at any level. In the proximal half of the lower leg, the closest anatomical structures to the inserted cerclage were arteria and vena tibialis posterior (at level 1: 5.2 resp. 4.3mm, at level 2: 4.0 resp. 5.5mm). In the distal half of the lower leg arteria and vena tibialis anterior (level 3: 1.8 and 2.0mm, level 4: 1.6 and 1.5mm), nervus fibularis profundus (level 3: 2.2mm, level 4: 1.2mm) and the tendon of musculus tibialis posterior (level 3: 0.8mm, level 4: 1.1mm) were in closest proximity of the cerclage. DiscussionThe results of this anatomical study suggest that the minimally invasive insertion of cerclages at the tibia without encasing relevant anatomical structures is possible but requires a correct operative technique. The structures at highest risk are arteria and vena tibialis posterior in the proximal half of the tibia and arteria and vena tibialis anterior, nervus fibularis profundus and the tendon of musculus tibialis posterior in the distal half. Level of evidenceNot applicable; experimental anatomical study.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.