Abstract
‘If economists ruled the world, there would be no need for a World Trade Organization.’1 What Paul Krugman illustrates here in his characteristic pictorial way is the simple facts that, from an economic point of view, trade is mutually beneficial for the countries involved and there is no need for negotiations about reciprocal trade agreements as is the case with the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT) now part of the World Trade Organization (WTO). For an economist free trade is essentially a unilateral matter; a country pursues its own interests best by creating free trade no matter what other countries do. There are exceptions to the argument for free trade, such as the ‘infant industries’ argument, the ‘optimal tariff’ argument and more recently ‘the new trade theory’.2 Nonetheless, in theory at least, a country should not have to demand reciprocal trade liberalization from a trading partner — an essential point in the GATT treaty — before lowering its own trade barriers. In pure economics terms it is hard to explain the existence of tariffs and the principle of reciprocity as enshrined in the GATT treaty. But fortunately — or unfortunately! — the world is not ruled by economists and those responsible for trade policy do not attach too much importance to the scientific findings of international trade theorists.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.