Abstract
The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) has been intended to provide healthcare coverage to that group of children previously caught between Medicaid eligibility and adequate access to employer insurance. However, SCHIP can be implemented quite differently across the states, potentially affecting actual enrollment. We review prior studies that have attempted to dissect how the administration of SCHIP impacts enrollment, including a multivariate study by the authors that indicates presumptive eligibility, expanded parent coverage, and 12-month continuous eligibility all contribute to a reduced likelihood of being uninsured. We then detail an administrative policy change in one state, Wisconsin, that yielded unanticipated and dramatic enrollment fluctuations in its SCHIP program, BadgerCare.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
