Abstract
Whenever science is drawn into the public eye as a component of some controversial issue, it is likely to be distorted during the process of generalization and simplification. Sometimes the media tend to sensationalize emerging scientific controversies, which often alienates scientists and further impedes the flow of information. Couple this tendency with intentional misstatements by special interest groups, and considerable public confusion can result. An example of this occurred in the DDT controversy of the 1960s, when chemical companies deliberately withheld evidence of the risk of DDT, issued false statements, and engaged in a campaign to discredit citizens and scientists who challenged the use of the insecticide.' Yet, although some misunderstanding of science may arise as a by-product of public participation in complex technical
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
