Abstract

The next generations of wireless networks will work in frequency bands ranging from sub-6 GHz up to 100 GHz. Radio signal propagation differs here in several critical aspects from the behaviour in the microwave frequencies currently used. With wavelengths in the millimetre range (mmWave), both penetration loss and free-space path loss increase, while specular reflection will dominate over diffraction as an important propagation channel. Thus, current channel model protocols used for the generation of mobile networks and based on statistical parameter distributions obtained from measurements become insufficient due to the lack of deterministic information about the surroundings of the base station and the receiver-devices. These challenges call for new modelling tools for channel modelling which work in the short-wavelength/high-frequency limit and incorporate site-specific details—both indoors and outdoors. Typical high-frequency tools used in this context—besides purely statistical approaches—are based on ray-tracing techniques. Ray-tracing can become challenging when multiple reflections dominate. In this context, mesh-based energy flow methods have become popular in recent years. In this study, we compare the two approaches both in terms of accuracy and efficiency and benchmark them against traditional power balance methods.

Highlights

  • The generation of wireless communication systems (5G) will be based on super high frequency (SHF) and extremely high frequency (EHF) technologies making use of the enormous amount of bandwidth available at high-frequency bands [1]

  • We show the computed spatial distribution of wave energy density using Dynamical Energy Analysis (DEA) for the geometry of figure 1b, and in figure 4b we show a sample Ray Tracing technique (RT) trajectory for the geometry of figure 1b

  • In the DEA calculation shown in figure 4a, the colour scale indicates the level of wave energy density

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The generation of wireless communication systems (5G) will be based on super high frequency (SHF) and extremely high frequency (EHF) technologies making use of the enormous amount of bandwidth available at high-frequency bands [1]. The transition from 4G to 5G and beyond calls for new methods and techniques for modelling network coverage. With a greatly increased density of base stations and demand for massive MIMO [4], beam-steering, peer-to-peer networks and a proliferation of communicating devices in the emerging Internet of Things, accurate modelling of network coverage down to the metre or even centimetre scale is paramount for cost-effective solutions towards maximizing wireless coverage where needed. Determining the electromagnetic (EM) field within systems of enclosures connected through apertures is a standard problem [22] with applications ranging from EMC issues to characterizing wireless communication in indoor scenarios. A detailed numerical comparison of these three methods for coupled enclosure scenarios is provided in subsequent sections

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call