Abstract

Wireless body area networks (WBANs) have strong potential in the field of health monitoring. However, the energy consumption required for accurate monitoring determines the time between battery charges of the wearable sensors, which is a key performance factor (and can be critical in the case of implantable devices). In this paper, we study the inherent trade-off between the power consumption of the sensors and the probability of misclassifying a patient’s health state. We formulate this trade-off as a dynamic problem, in which at each step, we can choose to activate a subset of sensors that provide noisy measurements of the patient’s health state. We assume that the (unknown) health state follows a Markov chain, so our problem is formulated as a partially observable Markov decision problem (POMDP). We show that all the past measurements can be summarized as a belief state on the true health state of the patient, which allows tackling the POMDP problem as an MDP on the belief state. Then, we empirically study the performance of a greedy one-step look-ahead policy compared to the optimal policy obtained by solving the dynamic program. For that purpose, we use an open-source Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) dataset of 232 patients over six months and extract the transition matrix and sensor accuracies from the data. We find that the greedy policy saves ≈50% of the energy costs while reducing the misclassification costs by less than 2% compared to the most accurate policy possible that always activates all sensors. Our sensitivity analysis reveals that the greedy policy remains nearly optimal across different cost parameters and a varying number of sensors. The results also have practical importance, because while the optimal policy is too complicated, a greedy one-step look-ahead policy can be easily implemented in WBAN systems.

Highlights

  • To convert our partially observable Markov decision problem (POMDP) into an MDP, we show that all the information captured in all the past outputs can be summarized using a belief vector, which is a probability vector over the possible health states

  • We study the empirical performance of the greedy policy using an open-source Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) dataset [8], which includes the measurements of 232 patients from different age groups and backgrounds over ≈6 months

  • We extend the POMDP model to allow multiple non-identical noisy sensors, which yield a vector of sensor outputs at each epoch

Read more

Summary

Related Work

Optimization techniques for WBANs regularly deal with optimizing the hardware and communication components, such as wireless communication protocols between the sensors and the controlling unit, to reduce energy consumption [9,10,11] Another stream of research has aimed to increase energy efficiency by optimizing the controlling algorithms, which usually concern sensor selection based on the information gained through the system’s activities [3,12], or optimizing the resource allocation in the system [13,14,15]. We extend the POMDP model to allow multiple non-identical noisy sensors, which yield a vector of sensor outputs at each epoch

Outline
Patient Health States
Sensors
Power and Misclassification Costs
Motivating Example
Belief States
Sensor Activation Control
Optimal Policy
One-Step Look-Ahead Greedy Policy
Accurate Sensor Use Case
Belief State Discretization
Use-Case Description
The Data
Health States
Health States provided measurement every
Sensor Accuracies
Model Parameter Extraction
Policy Comparison
Activation
Sensitivity Analysis
Empirical
WBAN Dynamics for the Greedy Policy
Comparison
11. Performance
Sensor Accuracy Sensitivity Analysis
Transition
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call