Abstract

Wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) has proven that it can produce medium to large components because of its high-rate deposition and potentially unlimited build size. Like all additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, however, an optimized process planning that provides uniform, defect-free deposition is key for the production of parts. Moreover, AM, particularly WAAM, is no longer just a prototyping technology, and most of today's attention is on its transformation to a viable and cost-effective production. With this transformation, a number of issues need to be addressed, including the accuracy and effectiveness of the manufactured components. Therefore, the emphasis should be on dimensional precision and surface finish in WAAM. This paper covers heat input and management concept, related to the resulting shrinkage, deformation, and residual stresses, which is particularly critical. In addition, we focus on process planning including build orientation, slicing, and path planning, as well as the definition of process parameter selection from a single track to multi-track and multilayer, and finally geometric features from a thin-wall to lattice structures with several case studies. Central to addressing component quality and accuracy, we summarize guiding designs and future needs through numerous WAAM-specific issues, which require for manufacturing of complex components.

Highlights

  • Due to its flexibility and process capabilities, additive manufacturing (AM) for the metal components has gained an increasing market share [1,2,3]

  • The other issue is the warping of the build plate, which causes the first layers of the part to deform

  • The influences of main process parameters and deposition strategies on the macroscopic properties and geometrical accuracy of Wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) for different geometrical features and case studies are discussed in this paper

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to its flexibility and process capabilities, additive manufacturing (AM) for the metal components has gained an increasing market share [1,2,3]. Powder bed fusion (PBF) is the most common metal-based method where a powder bed is deposited in layers between 20 and. It allows for a relatively fast (compared to PBF) realization of large dimensions, with almost no size limitations

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.