Abstract

Millions of birds die in bird-window collisions in the United States each year. In specialized test settings, researchers have developed methods to alter window designs to mitigate collisions. However, few published studies provide pretest and posttest evaluations of mitigation treatment areas and untreated control areas on existing buildings. We initially monitored bird-window collisions at a single building on the University of Utah campus in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, during winter 1 (November 9, 2017–January 2, 2018). We found 15 bird-window collisions, most under a portion of the building with a mirrored façade. To test a mitigation treatment, we installed Feather Friendly® bird deterrent film on part of the mirrored façade after winter 1. The unmitigated areas of the same building served as a control area. We continued monitoring during the following winter 2 (November 15, 2018–January 12, 2019). The treated area collisions declined from seven before mitigation to two after mitigation, a 71% reduction. The control area had eight collisions at both times. Results of a generalized estimating equation yielded a significant area by season interaction effect (p = 0.03) and fewer collisions in the mitigated area than the control area at winter 2 (p = 0.03), supporting efficacy of the mitigation. In winter 2 we also expanded monitoring to eight total buildings to evaluate the risks of mirrored windows and proximity to fruiting pear trees (Prunus calleryana) and the benefits of bird-friendly glass. Bird-friendly glass, found on two buildings, included windows with permanent fritted dots or embedded ultraviolet patterns. We counted 22 collisions across the eight buildings. Mirrored windows and proximity to fruiting pear trees related to higher odds of bird-window collisions, based on separate generalized estimating equations. The best fit model included mirrored windows and pear trees. The two buildings with bird-friendly glass had only one collision, suggesting that these designs deter collisions, although the difference was not statistically significant. To publicize the study and to receive reports of additional bird collisions or fatalities on campus, we created a citizen science project on iNaturalist and engaged in additional outreach efforts that yielded 22 ad hoc reports. Many previous studies have documented Cedar Waxwing (Bombycilla cedrorum) collisions, but at relatively low numbers. Cedar Waxwings accounted for 31 of 34 identifiable collisions from the monitoring study and 4 of 21 identifiable collisions or fatalities from ad hoc reports.

Highlights

  • Between 365 million and 988 million birds die in the U.S each year due to bird collisions against buildings, especially buildings with reflective windows, based on estimates from a systematic review of 23 studies (Loss et al, 2014)

  • We evaluated mitigation efficacy in conjunction with tests of collision risk factors across campus during winter, which is consistent with the call to study collisions outside of migratory seasons (Hager et al, 2017)

  • The only study we found that discussed a control area was a technical report from a Feather Friendly R mitigation at the University of Pennsylvania (Durrance, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Between 365 million and 988 million birds die in the U.S each year due to bird collisions against buildings, especially buildings with reflective windows, based on estimates from a systematic review of 23 studies (Loss et al, 2014). We evaluated mitigation efficacy in conjunction with tests of collision risk factors across campus during winter, which is consistent with the call to study collisions outside of migratory seasons (Hager et al, 2017). For free-hanging windows suspended near a woodland edge, wild birds will fly less often toward effectively mitigated than control windows (Klem, 1989; Klem, 1990; Klem, 2009). Buildings in the landscape each offer their own ‘‘mortality signatures,’’ with substantial variability in bird fatalities from one building to the (Hager et al, 2013) This variability requires more tests of mitigation and collision risk factors across diverse buildings, landscapes, species, and seasons

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call