Abstract
Avery Brundage, once head of the International Olympic Committee, described politics as ‘a savage monster’ always trying to disrupt sport. But Brundage was defending the decision not to withhold the 1936 Olympic Games from Nazi Germany. Thus, defending the sanctity of sport can itself be political. Sport is especially political in Asia. In the run-up to the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the Chinese ran a gauntlet of political causes ranging from corporate boycotts of the Games over China's policies in Darfur to an Olympic torch procession attacked by demonstrators in London, Paris, San Francisco and Seoul. By comparison, London had virtually no politics associated with it – unless you read deep political messages in the story of Mary Poppins or the reunion of the Spice Girls. This article makes three key points. First, the Olympics and international sport for that matter are intensely political. Second, sport is most intensely political in this region of the world. Third, the lessons we learn about the politics of sport have relevance for Russia's hosting of the 2014 Sochi Winter Games in the form of an inescapable dilemma that illiberal regimes bring upon themselves, called the Olympic ‘Catch-22’.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.