Abstract
While society’s most pressing socio-legal questions may be addressed mostly at the high court levels, the decisions of lower court judges are also important – especially if you happen to be a criminal defendant. Lower court judges are at least partially unconstrained by law and precedent (Mather 1991). Thus, there may be non-legal considerations that combine with matters of fact and law to help shape the decisions of lower court judges in a given set of circumstances (Jacob 1991). There is currently very little research on the influence of such factors on lower courts in Australia. Using a logistic regression technique, the nature of these considerations in state district court de novo criminal appeals is analyzed. The results show that both legal and demographic factors help to explain the outcomes on appeal for particular criminal defendants in the New South Wales District Court.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
