Abstract
The authors argue about how competition for recognition among scientists has led to abuses in scientific scholarship and consider alternatives to how credit is assigned. Topics include how scientific knowledge is a public good, how competition can create motivation for innovation and problem solving, and how the priority rule has been reconsidered in light of the benefits of scientific cooperation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
