Abstract

The study explores wing elasticity effects on the store-separation process. The nominal test case is that of an unmanned aerial vehicle that carries two identical stores on two wing stations. The stores are ejected during straight and level flight at , 2500 m. Simultaneous, time-accurate analysis of the dynamic aeroelastic wing response and the store’s trajectory reveals that the most significant aeroelastic effect is a roll motion developed by the store. This roll motion is due to misalignment of the ejection force vector and the store’s center of gravity, due to the wing’s static and dynamic elastic deformations. The second part of the paper presents a parametric study of the effects of various structural and configurational parameters on the wing’s response and consequently on the store’s rolling motion. A more flexible wing, a heavier store, a larger ejection force, or a shorter ejection period all result in increased store rolling. Store ejection from an asymmetric configuration (of a single store) yielded a very similar store roll compared to the symmetric ejection. The dynamic wing response plays a major role in generating the store roll, in different conditions of friction between the store body and ejection piston. A practical observation is that the store roll is dependent on the relation between the ejection period and the low structural frequencies of the wing. This can be used to plan an optimal ejection profile.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.