Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the universal filtered multi-carrier system (UFMC) for 5G and subsequent connections with the aid of the MATLAB package. It can be considered that the UFMC technology provides an advantage against inter-symbol interference (ISI) as well as inter-carrier interference (ICI) and low latency. The proposed system is simulated and analyzed in terms of error rates, the complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF), peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), error vector magnitude (EVM). In more specific, this paper shows a comparison of two UFMC systems, one with Dolph-Chebyshev filter and the other with Kaiser filter. Obtained results indicate that the performance of the UFMC with Kaiser is quite better than UFMC with Dolph-Chebyshev. Kaiser filter is employed in place of UFMC-based Dolph -Chebyshev to achieve better spectral energy and also to prevent leakage of the spectra. The obtained results also show the enhancement in the EVM and the power spectral density (PSD) criteria, e.g., Kaiser filter enhances the EVM by almost 0.2%. Furthermore, in contrast to applying the Dolph-Chebyshev window in UFMC, the Kaiser window can help in the decrease of PAPR for UFMC.
Highlights
Unlike previous work in Ref. [10], we suggest employing Kaiser window at the transmitter to mitigate the effect of OOB emission and improve the performance of the system
We investigate a different length for the candidates Dolph-Chebyshev and Kaiser window, where the performance results are scheduled in table 3
The error vector magnitude / Modulation error ratio (EVM / MER) [16,17] for the signals of the two systems are compared, and the results show that EVM of the universal filtered multi-carrier system (UFMC) symbols with Kaiser filter is 0.7 %, and the UFMC symbols equated with Dolph- Chebyshev filter is 0.9 %
Summary
Unlike previous work in Ref. [10], we suggest employing Kaiser window at the transmitter to mitigate the effect of OOB emission and improve the performance of the system. [10], we suggest employing Kaiser window at the transmitter to mitigate the effect of OOB emission and improve the performance of the system. We address the PAPR performance in UFMC systems. We compare the performances of two different windows in terms of error vector magnitude (EVM), PAPR, BER, and power spectral density (PSD) in the presence of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels. We utilize lower/upper-case boldface letters to indicate column /matrices vector, whereas lower-case letters indicate scalars
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
