Abstract

Abstract. One promising design solution for increasing the efficiency of modern horizontal axis wind turbines is the installation of curved tip extensions. However, introducing such complex geometries may move traditional aerodynamic models based on blade element momentum (BEM) theory out of their range of applicability. This motivated the present work, where a swept tip shape is investigated by means of both experimental and numerical tests. The latter group accounted for a wide variety of aerodynamic models, allowing us to highlight the capabilities and limitations of each of them in a relative manner. The considered swept tip shape is the result of a design optimization, focusing on locally maximizing power performance within load constraints. For the experimental tests, the tip model is instrumented with spanwise bands of pressure sensors and is tested in the Poul la Cour wind tunnel at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU). The methods used for the numerical tests consisted of a blade element model, a near-wake model, lifting-line free-wake models, and a fully resolved Navier–Stokes solver. The comparison of the numerical and the experimental test results is performed for a given range of angles of attack and wind speeds, which is representative of the expected conditions in operation. Results show that the blade element model cannot predict the measured normal force coefficients, but the other methods are generally in good agreement with the measurements in attached flow. Flow visualization and pressure distribution compare well with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The agreement in the clean case is better than in the tripped case at the inboard sections. Some uncertainties regarding the effect of the boundary layer at the inboard tunnel wall and the post-stall behavior remain.

Highlights

  • The trend of reducing the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of horizontal axis wind turbines through increasing rotor size has long been established

  • The geometry of the optimal tip is scaled with a factor of 0.5 compared to the rotating test rig (RTR) tip dimensions in order to be accommodated in the Poul la Cour wind tunnel (PLCT) at DTU (Fig. 5)

  • Before the results from the simulation methods can be compared to wind tunnel measurements, we need to quantify the difference in aerodynamic loading between the wing mounted on a wall, like it is modeled in the majority of the computational methods employed in the present study, and the wing mounted in the wind tunnel, which is what is being measured in the experiments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The trend of reducing the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of horizontal axis wind turbines through increasing rotor size has long been established. One promising blade design concept is advanced aeroelastically optimized blade tip extensions, which could drive rotor upscaling in a modular and cost-effective way. Such designs can be aligned with the wind turbine manufacturers’ trend to offer modular platform options for facilitating site-specific sales. Traditional-aircraft-related bibliography (e.g., see Hoerner and Borst, 1975) covers most of the aerodynamic aspects of winglets and swept wing tip shapes, but the specific design space and objectives of wind turbine applications require distinct research efforts even considering non-rotating setups, as in this work. There is no relevant research work focusing on details of tip shape aerodynamics relevant to the application of tip extensions for blade upscaling. Aerodynamic models of different fidelities are utilized to simulate the wind tunnel cases and are compared with the measurement data, namely a blade element model, a near-wake model, lifting-line freewake models, and a fully resolved Navier–Stokes solver

Tip model design
Wind tunnel test setup
Numerical simulations
Simulated geometries
HAWC2 and HAWC2 near wake
LLTunnel
EllipSys3D
Comparison of test and simulation results
Assessment of tunnel effects
Surface flow
Pressure distribution
Sectional loads
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.