Abstract

Wind‐driven spin‐up of the four‐layer, quasi‐isopycnic, eddy‐resolving primitive equation model of Bleck and Boudra (1981) is compared with that obtained with a (numerically dissimilar) “pure” isopycnic coordinate model and an isobaric (i.e., quasi‐Cartesian) coordinate model. In particular, the onset of hydrodynamic instabilities in the flow forced by a double‐gyre wind stress pattern is studied. The spin‐up processes associated with the isopycnic and quasi‐isopycnic model are found to be similar, whereas the flow pattern produced by the quasi‐Cartesian model deviates in the direction of Holland's (1978) and Holland and Lin's (1975a, b) two‐layer solutions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.