Abstract

In Judgement of 27th April 2010 the Constitutional Spanish Court sustained that lower Courts, interpreting a testamentary clause that included only the biological offspring, had committed a break of the principle of equality. This article tries, on the one hand, to demonstrate that the issue lacks constitutional relevance, as the equality between biological and adoptive offspring is a legal requirement yet not a constitutional one. On the other hand, it explores the question of whether testamentary freedom can be limited by other rights, and in particular, by the principle of equalityIn Judgement of 27th April 2010 the Constitutional Spanish Court sustained that lower Courts, interpreting a testamentary clause that included only the biological offspring, had committed a break of the principle of equality. This article tries, on the one hand, to demonstrate that the issue lacks constitutional relevance, as the equality between biological and adoptive offspring is a legal requirement yet not a constitutional one. On the other hand, it explores the question of whether testamentary freedom can be limited by other rights, and in particular, by the principle of equality.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.