Abstract

Abstract Particularly in western countries Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is the most widely used appraisal method supporting government decision-making on transport projects. A CBA expresses the impacts of a government project in monetary metrics based on the number of euros affected individuals and parties are willing to pay from their private income. However, the private WTP valuation approach is contested in the literature. One central critique is that this approach fails to consider that private choices may not fully reflect citizens' preferences over public goods and means. In response to this critique, academics developed three types of preference elicitation methods: (1) Collective willingness to pay; (2) Willingness to allocate public budget; (3) Participatory Value Evaluation. This chapter elaborates on these preference elicitation methods. We provide empirical examples of the application of these methods in the transport literature and we pay attention to the fact that these three classes of preference elicitation methods give individuals the opportunity to express a broader range of preferences compared to private WTP-based valuation methods.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.