Abstract

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 14, No. 10 CASESWilliam Searle v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., No. M2009-02045-COA-R3-CV, 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 627 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee (Nashville), October 6, 2010)Published Online:11 Jan 2011https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2010.141014AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byStructural Subjugation: Theorizing Racialized Sexual Harassment in HousingSSRN Electronic JournalVacatur of Awards Under the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act: Substance, Procedure, and Strategies for PractitionersSSRN Electronic JournalHuman Rights in State Courts 2014SSRN Electronic JournalMainstreaming Employment Contract Law: The Common Law Case for Reasonable Notice of TerminationSSRN Electronic JournalWhy Whistleblowers Lose: An Empirical and Qualitative Analysis of State Court CasesSSRN Electronic JournalThe Blurred Boundaries of Social Networking in the Legal Field: Just 'Face' itSSRN Electronic JournalDrinking from a Deep Well: The Public Trust Doctrine and Western Water LawSSRN Electronic Journal Volume 14Issue 10Dec 2010 Information© 2010 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:William Searle v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., No. M2009-02045-COA-R3-CV, 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 627 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee (Nashville), October 6, 2010).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Dec 2010.831-839.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2010.141014Published in Volume: 14 Issue 10: January 11, 2011PDF download

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.