Abstract
In the nineteenth century, farmers, doctors, and the wider public shared a family of questions and anxieties concerning heredity. Questions over whether injuries, mutilations, and bad habits could be transmitted to offspring had existed for centuries, but found renewed urgency in the popular and practical scientific press from the 1820s onwards. Sometimes referred to as “Lamarckism” or “the inheritance of acquired characteristics,” the potential for transmitting both desirable and disastrous traits to offspring was one of the most pressing scientific questions of the nineteenth century. As I argue in this paper, Carpenter’s religious commitments to abolition and the temperance movement shaped his understanding of heredity. But this also committed him to a body of evidence for the inheritance of acquired characteristics that was coming under criticism for being untrustworthy. Carpenter used his popular treatises on physiology to promote these older, familiar ideas about heredity because they provided vital means of arguing for the unity of mankind and the hereditary dangers of intemperance. While early nineteenth century physiology has been seen by some historians as a challenge to religious authority, given its potentially materialist accounts of the body and the actions of the soul, this paper demonstrates how the missionary and institutional activities of the Unitarian church were ideologically supported by Carpenter’s publications.
Highlights
In 1839, the 26-year-old medical student William Benjamin Carpenter, seeking to establish a reputation as a leading physiologist, was fast at work on his Principles of General and Comparative Physiology
Why was Carpenter, a devoted student of Prichard’s works, so determined to defend a view of heredity that had been rejected by his predecessors as contrary to experience, ill-informed, and doubtful? The very question of what our experience confirms about heredity was at stake, and Carpenter, armed with a publishing contract from John Churchill in London, was beginning a lifelong campaign to contend that our experience does confirm the very sort of events that Prichard regarded as ridiculous
Carpenter increasingly maintained that our everyday, familiar experience of heredity—the kind produced by animal breeders, plant breeders, and physicians that worked with families—was true and valuable, and ought to guide investigation (Carpenter 1873)
Summary
In 1839, the 26-year-old medical student William Benjamin Carpenter, seeking to establish a reputation as a leading physiologist, was fast at work on his Principles of General and Comparative Physiology. Keywords William Benjamin Carpenter · Heredity · Inheritance of acquired characteristics · Lamarckism · Physiology · Unitarian
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
