Abstract
BackgroundStudies testing the Willems method of age estimation with gender-specific scores on different population groups have reported consistently more accurate results over other methods. Not enough is known about the validity of Willems non-gender specific scores. AimThe present study aimed to compare the accuracy of the Willems I (gender-specific scores) and Willems II methods (non-gender-specific scores) in the age estimation of 5−15 year-old Indian children. DesignIn this cross-sectional observational study, the Willems I and II methods were tested and compared for accuracy in estimating the age of 1200 Indian children aged 5−15 years. ResultsThe mean differences between dental age calculated by the Willems I method and chronological age were +0.09±0.80 years, +0.08±0.80 years and +0.09±0.80 years for boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. With the Willems II method, the values were -0.06±0.80 years, +0.11±0.79 years and +0.01±0.80 years for boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. Both methods did not show any statistically significant differences between dental and chronological ages for either gender or the total sample (p>0.05). ConclusionThe Willems I method was more accurate in predicting age of boys, while the Willems II method was more accurate in girls in the present study, but not significantly so. Both methods are appropriate for use in this population.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
