Will Environmental Stewardship enhance small mammal abundance on intensively managed farmland?

Abstract

1 The creation of grassy field margins, as part of the UK Government's Environmental Stewardship (ES) scheme, is one of a number of measures proposed to mitigate the adverse effects of arable intensification on wildlife. Widespread development of these margins will potentially increase the amount of habitat available to small mammals in arable landscapes, as many species do not inhabit the cropped area. 2 The aim of this study was to determine what impact ES-type margins might have on small mammals. We compared small mammal abundance and biomass in spring and autumn on 3-m-wide and 6-m-wide grassy margins with that on conventionally managed field edges that have no margin (0 m wide) and are intensively cultivated to the field edge. 3 Bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus, wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus and common shrews Sorex araneus were the most abundant species; few field voles Microtus agrestis were captured on any margin. In autumn, bank vole and common shrew numbers were higher on the grassy margins than on conventional field edges, and margin width per se was positively associated with bank vole abundance. The number of wood mice captured did not differ among the different margin types. 4 Total small mammal biomass increased between spring and autumn on the 3-m- and 6-m-wide grassy margins, but decreased on the 0-m-wide margins. Total biomass in autumn was three times higher on 6-m-wide margins compared with the conventional arable field edges.