Abstract

Academic libraries are among the organizations advocating for open educational resources (OER), often playing a key campus role in education, advocacy, and support of their creation and publication. Publication of OER resonates with the role of the academic library. Because “incongruence in perceptions” (Chtena 2019: 24) can cause difficulties and unforeseen challenges with implementation and use of OER, organizations involved in OER initiatives need familiarity with how OER and organizational values align. The goal of this exploration was to investigate how academic libraries enact academic library publishing programs and the ramification that has in the diffusion process of OER in higher education. Data collected in this single case study research project was analyzed through the lens of Diffusion of Innovations Theory. The findings from the study suggest that, if academic libraries are to enact the creation and publication of OER in ways appropriate to their conception, those involved will need to be intentional about ensuring enactment of the values foundational to OER. Future suggested research includes a multiple-case study comparative research study looking at academic library publication of OER, exploration of how opinion leaders and attributes of innovations impact academic library publication of OER, and investigation into the impact of organizational structure on the diffusion of OER creation and publication.

Highlights

  • IntroductionAcademic institutions and organizations are expanding their support for the creation and publication of open educational resources (Hess, Nann, & Riddle 2016)

  • Essmiller and AsinoJournal of InteractiveAcademic institutions and organizations are expanding their support for the creation and publication of open educational resources (Hess, Nann, & Riddle 2016)

  • This study found that there are both similarities and differences in how the Midland State Library publishes open educational resources (OER) versus its other academic library publishing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Academic institutions and organizations are expanding their support for the creation and publication of open educational resources (Hess, Nann, & Riddle 2016). The high levels of perceived compatibility between these organizations and OER may lead to their incorrect development and implementation (Rogers 2003). Others consider development of OER in terms of serving the common good and democratizing access to knowledge (Lauritsen 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call