Wildfire risk management across diverse bioregions in a changing climate

Abstract

Wildfire risk-management needs to consider interrelated factors that influence fire regimes, including changing climate and sometimes conflicting stakeholder priorities. With wildfires increasing in size and intensity over recent decades, wildfire risk management is becoming more important and more complex. For southwest Australia, wildfire risk-management is predicated on a longitudinal study of the relationship between prescribed burns and wildfires from 1953–2004 over a subset of this biodiverse region. Our study replicates the methodology of the longitudinal study, applying it to the wider region and extending the analysis to 2021. We found the extrapolation of the longitudinal study’s findings to the wider region invalid, as was extrapolation beyond 2004. In particular, the area of prescribed burns generally had negligible influence on wildfire area. However, more spatially complex fire history was strongly correlated with lower probability of large wildfires (independent of area burned). This highlights the limitation of extrapolating wildfire risk-management policies to areas of differing vegetation and/or climate, including changing climate over time. The potential of indigenous-led practices for wildfire risk and biodiversity conservation, particularly for areas with high spatial variability, is apparent as is the need for alternative strategies to prescribed burning as the primary tool in wildfire-risk mitigation.