Abstract

Abstract Salmon farming has multiplied from a side business of coastal farmers to one of the world's major aquaculture species. This has dramatically altered the disease dynamics between farmed and wild salmonids. As salmon fish farming has increased, new restrictions have been enforced to combat emerging density-dependent impacts of pathogen spillover. In most northern and arctic regions, the effects of pathogens from fish farms on wild salmonids have been minimal for two key reasons: (i) relative low density of fish farms in the north and (ii) cold water temperatures. However, both factors are set to change dramatically. On one side, there is an increasing interest in utilizing northern areas for fish farming due to limited capacity for expansion in mid-latitude regions. On the other side, climate change is rapidly changing these northern ecosystems. High-latitude regions inhabit some of the largest remaining wild Atlantic salmon populations in the world along with sea trout and Arctic charr. Wild salmonids in the north have most likely seldom been exposed to high infection pressure, and we question how these populations will cope with changes that are coming. We identify 12 research questions emerging from these imminent changes and discuss methodologies for addressing them. We conclude that policies related to fish farming must consider uncertainties with respect to pathogen dynamics in the north until these research questions are fully addressed.

Highlights

  • Intensive marine finfish farming has been a hugely influential industry in many nations in recent decades (UN FAO, 2018)

  • There is little debate about whether salmon lice can have a negative impact on wild salmon, but it is still highly controversial how much of the declining marine survival of salmon observed in some regions can be attributed to the salmon lice originated from fish farming (Vollset, 2019)

  • The future of wild salmon and salmon farming depends on a critical question: how will wild fish in a higher latitude ecosystem respond to coming aquaculture expansion in the northern regions? Here, we argue that ecoepidemiological science is lagging behind aquaculture industry expansion in the north and that research is needed to understand and how wild salmonid populations will respond to new pathogen diversity that will inevitably come with fish farms and climate change

Read more

Summary

Food for Thought

Wild salmonids are running the gauntlet of pathogens and climate as fish farms expand northwards. Jan Grimsrud Davidsen 2, Sindre Havarstein Eldøy, Trond E. E., Madhun, A., Karlsson, S., and Miller, K. Salmon farming has multiplied from a side business of coastal farmers to one of the world’s major aquaculture species This has dramatically altered the disease dynamics between farmed and wild salmonids. In most northern and arctic regions, the effects of pathogens from fish farms on wild salmonids have been minimal for two key reasons: (i) relative low density of fish farms in the north and (ii) cold water temperatures. Both factors are set to change dramatically.

Background
Pathogens and epidemics
Pathogen interactions between wild and farmed fish
Theoretical framework
Climate change may impact disease dynamics
How will Northern populations cope with altered pathogen dynamics?
Twelve emerging research questions
Research question
Species prevalence or virulence of pathogens?
Does a latitudinal gradient in immunocompetence of salmonids exist?
Does stocking affect the prevalence of pathogens?
Molecular techniques
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call