Abstract

Abstract The archaeological discussion still appears to largely disregard the role of natural resources in the early agricultural economy of Central Europe. Cereal cultivation and animal husbandry strategies remain a central area of studies. Wild resources are the only proxy data helping to reconstruct the strategies mentioned above. The data for the assessment of the wild resource role in consumption strategies are scarce. Plant and animal remains preserved within the archaeological sites represent one of the very few sources of information. The dominant funeral rite – cremation – leaves no opportunity for insight into the human bones’ diet composition signatures. This study’s primary goal is to gather in one place all information concerning wild resource food use based on archaeological data, which is scattered through various publications. The study’s time scope corresponds to Lusatian, post-Lusatian (Pomeranian Face Urn Culture), and contemporary cultures (Western Baltic Kurgans Culture). It covers roughly the time span 1400–400 BC, which is the late Bronze and early Iron Ages. Only data from a homogenous settlement context was included within the presented review. Although the reviewed literature methodology does not always meet the modern standard, it still offers insight into broader plant and animal food use in the past. The animal bone analysis is usually based on hand-collected bone material or sifted soil samples. Malacological materials come from sampled features. Some clam mussels were also identified among the bone materials submitted for zooarchaeological analysis. All plant materials come from sampled features undergoing soil analysis.

Highlights

  • The archaeological discussion still appears to largely disregard the role of natural resources in the early agricultural economy of Central Europe

  • Some species of mushrooms were undoubtedly used in prehistoric times as food sources

  • Historical ethnographic data suggest that natural resources play a vital role in the economy, even in relatively recent time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The archaeological discussion still appears to largely disregard the role of natural resources in the early agricultural economy of Central Europe. A greater emphasis is usually paid to cereal cultivation and animal husbandry strategies. There are mentions of wild plants in the literature. They are still only proxy data in assessing different cultivation process elements (weediness, soil richness, time, and harvesting techniques). The presence of open habitat plant indicators in pollen profiles, mostly plants resistant to trampling, helps to assess the space suitable for grazing The environmental conditions of the European Lowlands and the role of “wild resources” in ethnographic data of relatively recent times suggest that such an “excluding” approach significantly reduces our understanding

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call