Abstract
BackgroundForaging activities of wild boar (Sus scrofa) create small‐scale soil disturbances in many different vegetation types. Rooting alters species composition by opening niches for less‐competitive plants and, as a recurrent factor, becomes a part of the community disturbance regime. Vegetation responses to wild boar disturbance have mostly been studied in the boar's non‐native range or in native forest, rather than in open habitats in the native range. We investigate the response of open European semidry grassland vegetation dominated by Brachypodium pinnatum to native wild boar pressure in an abandoned agricultural landscape.MethodsTo describe the disturbance regime, we repeatedly mapped rooted patches during a 5‐year period. Additionally, to study the vegetation response, we performed an artificial disturbance experiment by creating 30 pairs of simulated disturbances and undisturbed plots. The vegetation composition of the paired plots was repeatedly sampled five times in eight years of the study.ResultsBased on repeated mapping of disturbances, we predict that if the disturbance regime we observed during the 5‐year period were maintained over the long term, it would yield a stable vegetation ratio consisting of 98.7% of the grassland undisturbed, 0.4% with fresh disturbance, and 0.9% in older successional stages.Vegetation composition in the artificially disturbed plots was continuously converging to that of undisturbed vegetation, but these disturbed plots still differed significantly in composition and had higher species number, even after eight years of succession.SynthesisOur results thus show that wild boar disturbance regime in its native range increases heterogeneity and species diversity of semidry grassland vegetation.
Highlights
Disturbance structures natural communities by opening regenera‐ tion niches for less‐competitive species (Sousa, 1984)
In comparison with forests, investigation of wild boar disturbances in open habitats in their native distribution has been scant (Barrios‐Garcia & Ballari, 2012). This includes an experiment conducted in semidry grassland vegetation using both artificial and natural disturbances, which showed changes in plant species and trait composition
We established an eight‐ year‐long field experiment to study succession on patches where we simulated wild boar rooting and compared vegetation on these arti‐ ficial disturbances to vegetation on undisturbed plots
Summary
Disturbance structures natural communities by opening regenera‐ tion niches for less‐competitive species (Sousa, 1984). Examination of the responses of vegetation composition to wild boar rooting in their native range has been focused mostly on forest understory Studies have shown both increases and decreases in diversity (Brunet, Hedwall, Holmstr, & Wahlgren, 2016), depending on disturbance intensity (Burrascano et al, 2015). In comparison with forests, investigation of wild boar disturbances in open habitats in their native distribution has been scant (Barrios‐Garcia & Ballari, 2012) This includes an experiment conducted in semidry grassland vegetation using both artificial and natural disturbances, which showed changes in plant species and trait composition. We aim to (a) quantify the natural frequency of wild boar disturbance; (b) docu‐ ment changes in species composition and their development over time; (c) directly assess the relationships of alpha and beta diversity to disturbance For these purposes, we chose open semidry vegetation domi‐ nated by the competitive grass Brachypodium pinnatum. We established an eight‐ year‐long field experiment to study succession on patches where we simulated wild boar rooting and compared vegetation on these arti‐ ficial disturbances to vegetation on undisturbed plots
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.