Abstract

Relational Quantum Mechanics is an interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed by Carlo Rovelli. Rovelli argues that, in the same spirit as Einstein’s theory of relativity, physical quantities can only have definite values relative to an observer. Relational Quantum Mechanics is hereby able to offer a principled explanation of the problem of nested measurement, also known as Wigner’s friend. Since quantum states are taken to be relative states that depend on both the system and the observer, there is no inconsistency in the descriptions of the observers. Federico Laudisa has recently argued, however, that Rovelli’s description of Wigner’s friend is ambiguous, because it does not take into account the correlation between the observer and the quantum system. He argues that if this correlation is taken into account, the problem with Wigner’s friend disappears and, therefore, a relativization of quantum states is not necessary. I will show that Laudisa’s criticism is not justified. To the extent that the correlation can be accurately reflected, the problem of Wigner’s friend remains. An interpretation of quantum mechanics that provides a solution to it, like Relational Quantum Mechanics, is therefore a welcome one.

Highlights

  • The Wigner’s friend thought experiment formulated by Eugene Wigner [15] makes it very clear how hard it is to determine when collapse happens

  • I will explain why this is the case in Sect. 4, but for it is important to see why Wigner’s friend poses a problem if we use the analysis presented above

  • Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) is developed mostly by Rovelli [11, 12, 14] and, just like QBists, Rovelli argues for a relativization of quantum states

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Wigner’s friend thought experiment formulated by Eugene Wigner [15] makes it very clear how hard it is to determine when collapse happens. The story of the experiment is as follows: Wigner is standing outside a lab in which his friend is performing a measurement on a quantum system with two possible outcomes. Since Wigner himself is outside the lab, he doesn’t know which outcome his friend measures. He does know that his friend and the system will interact and that

86 Page 2 of 13
Wigner’s Friend
86 Page 4 of 13
Relational Quantum Mechanics
86 Page 6 of 13
Laudisa’s Critique
86 Page 8 of 13
Conclusion
86 Page 12 of 13

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.