Abstract

BackgroundHybridization between species is of conservation concern as it might threaten the genetic integrity of species. Anthropogenic factors can alter hybridization dynamics by introducing new potentially hybridizing species or by diminishing barriers to hybridization. This may even affect sympatric species pairs through environmental change, which so far has received little attention. We studied hybridization prevalence and the underlying behavioral mechanisms in two sympatric grasshopper species, a rare specialist (Chorthippus montanus) and a common generalist (Chorthippus parallelus). We conducted a mate choice experiment with constant intraspecific density and varying heterospecific density, i.e. varying relative frequency of both species.ResultsMate choice was frequency-dependent in both species with a higher risk of cross-mating with increasing heterospecific frequency, while conspecific mating increased linearly with increasing conspecific density. This illustrates that reproductive barriers could be altered by environmental change, if the relative frequency of species pairs is affected. Moreover, we performed a microsatellite analysis to detect hybridization in twelve syntopic populations (and four allotopic populations). Hybrids were detected in nearly all syntopic populations with hybridization rates reaching up to 8.9 %. Genetic diversity increased for both species when hybrids were included in the data set, but only in the common species a positive correlation between hybridization rate and genetic diversity was detected.ConclusionOur study illustrates that the relative frequency of the two species strongly determines the effectiveness of reproductive barriers and that even the more choosy species (Ch. montanus) may face a higher risk of hybridization if population size decreases and its relative frequency becomes low compared to its sister species. The asymmetric mate preferences of both species may lead to quasi-unidirectional gene flow caused by unidirectional backcrossing. This might explain why genetic diversity increased only in the common species, but not in the rare one. Altogether, the hybridization rate was much higher than expected for a widely sympatric species pair.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0460-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Hybridization between species is of conservation concern as it might threaten the genetic integrity of species

  • While natural hybridization is recognized as a significant evolutionary process [4, 5], anthropogenic hybridization is often negatively valued by conservation biologists [1]

  • The number of conspecific matings of the non-target species was similar between species, but for both species the number of matings increased with increasing number of conspecifics (GLM, Rd = 250.9, df = 318, z = 7.41, p < 0,001; Fig. 3b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hybridization between species is of conservation concern as it might threaten the genetic integrity of species. Anthropogenic factors can alter hybridization dynamics by introducing new potentially hybridizing species or by diminishing barriers to hybridization This may even affect sympatric species pairs through environmental change, which so far has received little attention. Hybridization can trigger speciation and could lead to new adaptations in a changing environment [4, 6,7,8] It can increase genetic diversity if hybrids are fertile, niches are available and both parental species have a high fitness [9]. Hybridization can trigger the collapse of populations (and species) by genetic displacement [12] and the negative effects of hybridization on rare species dominate the discussion in conservation biology [1, 13, 14]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call