Why we should develop guidelines and quantitative standards for using genetic data to delimit subspecies for data‐poor organisms like cetaceans

Abstract

AbstractObtaining the representative morphological data required for traditional taxonomy is difficult, and sometimes impossible, for cetaceans, especially large ones. As a result, three quarters of the 88 currently recognized extant species have no subspecies and 40 taxa likely have additional unnamed taxa. Conservation needs give urgency to improving taxonomy because unnamed taxa are unlikely to receive protection equivalent to that received by named taxa. Genetic data can improve efforts to delimit subspecies, but the markers and methods used have varied and the magnitude of genetic difference used to justify subspecies distinctions across studies has also varied. Here, we define the concepts of populations, subspecies, and species to establish a foundation for developing guidelines (data to include and analyses to conduct) and quantitative standards (the magnitude of differentiation expected at different taxonomic levels) for using genetic data to support taxonomic recognition. Our definition is particularly applicable to data‐poor groups because it allows for naming a subspecies when there is uncertainty about whether lineages have diverged sufficiently for species‐level recognition. This allows a species that lacks convincing data for lineage divergence to be recognized as a subspecies while sufficient data are accrued, which could take decades for some cetaceans.