Abstract
AbstractIn a recent article in this journal, José María Ariso makes the argument that the killing of innocent, non‐threatening people is not a universal moral certainty. To make this case, he gives two examples where the certainty is seemingly not present: the pisa‐suave child soldiers in the Colombian civil war and the often‐discussed case of Nazi Germany. This paper is an attempt to respond to these criticisms. I will respond to each charge in turn and argue that they do not pose a problem to the idea that the wrongness of killing innocent, non‐threatening people is a universal moral certainty.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
