Abstract

Bigheaded Carp have spread throughout the Mississippi River basin since the 1970s. Little has stopped the spread as carp have the ability to pass through locks and dams, and they are currently approaching the Great Lakes. However, the location of the leading edge in the Illinois River has stalled for over a decade, even though there is no barrier preventing further advancement towards the Great Lakes. Defining why carp are not moving towards the Great Lakes is important for predicting why they might advance in the future. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that anthropogenic contaminants in the Illinois River may be playing a role in preventing further upstream movement of Bigheaded Carp. Ninety three livers were collected from carp at several locations between May and October of 2018. Liver samples were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in a targeted metabolite profiling approach. Livers from carp at the leading edge had differences in energy use and metabolism, and suppression of protective mechanisms relative to downstream fish; differences were consistent across time. This body of work provides evidence that water quality is linked to carp movement in the Illinois River. As water quality in this region continues to improve, consideration of this impact on carp spread is essential to protect the Great Lakes.

Highlights

  • Understanding the distribution of species has long been a focus of ecological research

  • When the two species of carp sampled from the Illinois River were compared to each other independent of sample location, results indicated complete separation in liver metabolite signatures mirroring the pattern seen in the all species location analysis (Fig 1C and 1A)

  • Reduced eicosanoyl glycerol levels seen in bigheaded carp from the leading edge of the Illinois River could be a result of elevated energy use in situ due to reductions in water quality [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the distribution of species has long been a focus of ecological research. The distribution of a species results from a complex, dynamic interaction of biotic and abiotic factors [1, 2] that provide access to resources such as food and habitat, enabling successful survival and reproduction [3], coupled with elements of recruitment, migration, gene flow and chance [4, 5]. Human activities can alter biotic and abiotic factors in the environment and result in changes to the distribution of species.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call