Abstract
about the states are inappropriate and odd, Rubin and Feeley argue, but they do not seriously interfere with Americans' way of life.2 Judges and commentators express a fond regard for the states, but they tend to favor only the most modest judicial efforts at preserving local autonomy; they hem in their federalism doctrine so that it can do little to threaten what is, in fact, a profound commitment to national unity. Lynn A. Baker and Ernest A. Young do not hedge.3 Unlike Rubin and Feeley's neurotics, who are burdened with an unnecessary obsession, but who do not let it interfere with their healthy pursuit of
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
