Abstract
In this article, a rationale for routine use of self-report questionnaires in rheumatology clinical care is presented. Studies performed according to structured clinical research methodologies, including population-based studies, inception cohort studies, randomized controlled clinical trials, and meta-analyses of these trials, have significant limitations in describing accurately the long-term natural history and results of treatment of rheumatoid arthritis; the most accurate data have been derived from clinical observations of consecutive, nonselected patients in routine clinical settings. Self-report questionnaires provide accurate and representative data concerning clinical status and traditional laboratory and variables in large numbers of patients can be developed using microcomputer hardware and software available only over the last decade. Further collection of self-report data in rheumatology clinical care should result in more informative descriptions of the long-term natural history and results of therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
