Abstract

Abstract The common argument to explain codification of criminal sanctions is departing from arbitrary sentencing. By limiting judicial discretion, sentencing codification should reduce disparity. By a simple theoretical model, we show that strategic judicial behavior can actually undermine statutory sentencing, thus producing more rather than less variance in severity of punishment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call