Abstract
AbstractBiberauer, Newton & Sheehan () claim that clause‐final particles are categorially deficient. This move is motivated by the fact that a number of VO languages ‐ among them Mandarin Chinese ‐ display sentence‐final particles (SFPs), which, when analysed as complementisers, violate the purportedly universal Final‐over‐Final Constraint (FOFC). The FOFC excludes structures where a head‐final projection dominates a head‐initial one. In contrast, the present article argues that SFPs in Chinese instantiate C in a three‐layered split CP à la Rizzi (, ) and hence are “visible” for the FOFC. Furthermore, to equate The World Atlas of Language Structures' (WALS) label adverbial subordinator with complementiser as Biberauer et al. (, ) do is shown to be problematic, given that it turns out to be a cover term for different categories. Accordingly, WALS' results for the distribution of adverbial subordinator cannot be mechanically used as testing ground for the predictions made by the FOFC for the category C.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
